Anti-choicer: give fetuses the same right to life...

improlife:

softbutchcryptids:
improlife:
softbutchcryptids:
improlife:
softbutchcryptids:
improlife:
softbutchcryptids:
improlife:
softbutchcryptids:
Anti-choicer: give fetuses the same right to life as every other human!!!!
Pro-choicer: okay *doesn’t allow fetuses to use someone else’s body without Their consent* *doesn’t allow forced organ donation/use for benefit of fetus*
Anti-choicers: no!!!! Not like that!!!!
Ok you don’t get to murder other people so can’t murder a baby
It’s not murder, it’s just not going out of your way to sustain their life. If I dont decide to go out of my way to donate a kidney to someone who is dying I have not murdered them.
The difference is that your call to not donate may or may not kill someone. That guy might still be lucky enough to find someone who is willing to donat a kidney but abortion your call and your choice has directly killed an innocent life
Even If I was the only human in the world to have a kidney match, therefore your may or may not argument doesn’t work, I have still not murdered anyone. Which is why even if my uterus is the only one in the world and I refuse to give it up to a fetus, I have not murdered. I have just refused to be used to sustain life. There is a difference. Not actively sustaining a life does not equal murder.
Your literally telling a doctor to kill the baby inside you while your not telling the doctor to kill the guy needing a kidney. It’s killing a baby
No I’m telling a doctor to remove a fetus from my body. I’m telling the doctor neither can use my body for survival. The fetus not being able to live seperate from using my body is just an outcome. As is the person not being able to survive without my kidney, the death is just the outcome. I’m all for removing a fetus and putting it on life suport if the fetus is compatible with life at that stage. But not going out of your way to save someone’s life does not equal murder. Which is why not going out of my way to continue a pregnancy doesn’t equal me murdering the fetus.
Your not listening. If you don’t donate an organ someone else can still come by and donate an organ to save his life. It would not be your fault he ended up in a position where he needs someone else’s organ. If you take a fetus out of your body your decision actively as you put it “ not being able to survive outside of the womb is the outcome” which means that it kills the baby. It’s your fault it’s dead. It’s killing a baby.
No you’re clearly not listening I already said even if I’m the only one who can donate an organ that would save his life, and I dont. I have not murdered him. I literally already said that. Even if that decision leads to his death, I have no obligation to sustain his life using my body. Just like I have no obligation to sustain a fetuses life using my body.
Even then your not the reason why the guy who needs the organ is put in that position but your the reason why the fetus is they’re. Also it’s a false fallacy. In no situation would you be the only person to be able to donate a kidney whatsoever.

Yes it would never happen but the fact still remains that not using your body to provide somone life is your right as a human and does not make you a murder. Even if you are the only one able to save someone’s life. If it wasn’t okay in the kidney example then it wouldn’t be okay in any other situation, but it is in the example and in every other situation.

So it has to be my fault for me to be forced to sustain someone with my body? Well if I’m raped it’s not my fault, it’s the rapists so I can abort. If my contraception fails it’s not my fault it’s the contraception/ contraception companies fault, so I can abort. If I’m uneducated on how reproduction/pregnancy works then it’s not my fault it’s my partners for exploiting me/the education system for failing me so I can abort.

Mar 20, 2019